According to FINRA, Jake Louis Fruge was fined $10,000 and suspended for 24 months for engaging in an outside business activity as an owner and co-CEO of a company that engaged in e-commerce and lead generation without providing prior written notice to his member firm.
The OBA's customers - including certain firm customers and firm registered representatives - each paid an up-front fee of at least $40,000 per e-commerce storefront and $4,000 per digital real estate website, then received a percentage of any income those storefronts and websites generated. Fruge did not disclose any component of the OBA to the firm until after it was founded, when he orally disclosed only the e-commerce storefront component. The firm approved this component several months later, by which time customers had already paid substantial fees to the OBA.
The digital real estate component of the OBA was reported to the firm the following year, by which time customers had already purchased over 900 digital real estate websites and Fruge had earned a significant amount from his involvement. Following approval of the e-commerce component, the firm learned that the OBA had been marketed to other firm registered representatives, potentially creating a conflict of interest. The firm warned Fruge to stop this conduct and requested information about firm customers or representatives who had purchased e-commerce storefronts, but Fruge did not provide the requested information.
Fruge's failure to provide complete and prior written OBA disclosures - including late disclosure of the e-commerce component, late disclosure of the digital real estate component, and failure to provide the list of firm representatives and customers who were also OBA customers - undermined the firm's ability to evaluate the OBA and determine whether to restrict or prohibit Fruge's participation. Later, the firm directed Fruge to stop marketing the e-commerce component, but he continued to market products of the company. The firm ultimately made Fruge choose between his OBA and working for it, and he chose to continue with his OBA.
This case demonstrates the importance of complete and timely disclosure of outside business activities, particularly when they involve selling products or services to firm customers and representatives, which creates clear conflicts of interest.