← Broker database 2023-02-03

UBS Securities Fined $475,000 for Inaccurate Execution Quality Reports

fined $475,000

According to FINRA, UBS Securities LLC was censured and fined $475,000 for publishing inaccurate monthly statistics regarding execution of covered orders in violation of Rule 605 of Regulation NMS.

The violations stemmed from coding errors in the firm's alternative trading system that caused significant inaccuracies in its Rule 605 execution quality reports. Due to one coding error, the firm's reports were based on parent orders instead of the child orders that actually executed, and certain covered child orders were completely excluded from the reports. This resulted in substantially underreporting the number of covered orders and related shares the firm received, executed, and cancelled. A separate coding error caused the firm to double-count cancel shares, overreporting cancelled shares for approximately three years.

Rule 605 of Regulation NMS requires market centers to make monthly, electronic disclosures of statistical information about their order executions. These reports help investors and their brokers evaluate execution quality and make informed routing decisions. When these reports contain inaccurate data, it undermines market transparency and prevents investors from making informed choices about where to route their orders.

The case also revealed supervisory failures. UBS's supervisory system for Rule 605 compliance relied on manual review of an unreasonably small sample of orders, and excluded cancelled orders entirely from review. This inadequate supervision allowed the reporting errors to persist undetected. Even after discovering one coding error, the firm took 17 months to correct it.

For investors, this case underscores the importance of execution quality and the regulatory framework designed to ensure transparency. When firms fail to accurately report execution statistics, it compromises the market's ability to function efficiently and fairly. The substantial fine reflects the seriousness of providing misleading information to the investing public over an extended period.

Source: FINRA disciplinary actions (PDF)