Bad Brokers

According to FINRA, John Alfred Dow Jr. has been barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for refusing to produce documents requested by FINRA.

The investigation arose from a Form U5 filed by Dow's former firm disclosing that he had terminated his association while under in...

Read More

According to FINRA, John Alfred Dow Jr. has been barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for refusing to produce documents requested by FINRA.

The investigation arose from a Form U5 filed by Dow's former firm disclosing that he had terminated his association while under internal review. The review concerned non-firm approved activities involving a family member client, including serving as executor of the family member's estate and activities with respect to two outside checking accounts held with the family member.

When FINRA requested documents related to these matters, Dow refused to comply. FINRA Rule 8210 requires associated persons to provide information and documents requested by FINRA in connection with investigations and examinations.

A bar from the securities industry is a serious sanction, but refusal to cooperate with regulatory investigations is itself a serious violation. When individuals refuse to provide requested information, it prevents regulators from determining whether investor harm may have occurred.

Investors should understand that FINRA's investigative authority exists to protect them. When industry professionals refuse to cooperate with investigations, it raises concerns about what they may be hiding and results in their permanent removal from the industry.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Charles William Wodrich has been barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for failing to respond fully to FINRA's requests for information and refusing to provide testimony.

The investigation began after a complaint to FINRA's Securities Helpline for Sen...

Read More

According to FINRA, Charles William Wodrich has been barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for failing to respond fully to FINRA's requests for information and refusing to provide testimony.

The investigation began after a complaint to FINRA's Securities Helpline for Seniors. FINRA was investigating whether Wodrich provided misleading information to a senior customer, recommended securities transactions not in the customer's best interest, and used a personal email account for securities business.

FINRA requested telephone numbers Wodrich used with customers, telephone records, information about discretionary trading, and names of customers he communicated with via personal email. Despite multiple requests, Wodrich provided only partial responses and wrote that he "do[es] not consent" to FINRA's requests.

Wodrich also failed to appear for on-the-record testimony, offering no explanation other than that he did not consent to the request.

Cooperation with regulatory investigations is mandatory for securities industry participants. When professionals refuse to cooperate, particularly in investigations involving senior investors, it prevents regulators from determining whether investor harm occurred and results in industry bars.

Senior investors are often targeted for financial exploitation, making FINRA's Helpline for Seniors an important resource. Investors or their families can report concerns at 844-574-3577.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Jason Brooks Head has been barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for converting over $498,000 from two customers for his personal use.

Head withdrew at least $231,733 from five brokerage, advisory, and line of credit accounts belonging to one customer...

Read More

According to FINRA, Jason Brooks Head has been barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for converting over $498,000 from two customers for his personal use.

Head withdrew at least $231,733 from five brokerage, advisory, and line of credit accounts belonging to one customer. He primarily wired funds to accounts he controlled at other banks and initiated ACH transfers to directly pay his expenses. The customer was not aware of and did not authorize these withdrawals.

Head also withdrew at least $267,000 from a liquidity access line of credit belonging to a second customer, depositing the funds in his own bank accounts. This customer did not authorize seven of these withdrawals.

For one additional $80,000 withdrawal, Head persuaded the second customer to authorize the transfer by falsely claiming there was an opportunity to invest in a company's IPO. The purported IPO did not exist, and Head deposited the funds in his own account.

This case represents egregious misconduct involving theft from customers through unauthorized transfers and outright fraud. Investors should regularly review their account statements and question any transactions they did not authorize. If you suspect unauthorized activity, contact your firm and FINRA immediately.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Gwendolyn Janice Hayes has been barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for refusing to produce information requested during a FINRA examination.

The examination concerned allegations that Hayes changed customers' investment objectives without their con...

Read More

According to FINRA, Gwendolyn Janice Hayes has been barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for refusing to produce information requested during a FINRA examination.

The examination concerned allegations that Hayes changed customers' investment objectives without their consent, mismarked transactions as unsolicited when they were actually solicited, and accepted trading instructions from unauthorized individuals.

When FINRA requested information related to these serious allegations, Hayes refused to comply. Under FINRA rules, associated persons must provide information and documents requested in connection with examinations and investigations.

Changing customer investment objectives without authorization can expose customers to unsuitable investments. Mismarking solicited trades as unsolicited can hide patterns of unsuitable recommendations. Accepting instructions from unauthorized individuals violates customer account protections.

Hayes's refusal to cooperate prevented FINRA from fully investigating these allegations. While a bar may seem harsh for non-cooperation alone, FINRA cannot effectively protect investors if industry professionals refuse to participate in regulatory oversight.

Investors should ensure their stated investment objectives accurately reflect their goals and review trade confirmations to verify whether transactions were marked as solicited or unsolicited.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Jonathan Manuel Aguilera has been barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for refusing to provide information or documents requested during a FINRA investigation.

The investigation was opened following Aguilera's termination from his member firm. The fi...

Read More

According to FINRA, Jonathan Manuel Aguilera has been barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for refusing to provide information or documents requested during a FINRA investigation.

The investigation was opened following Aguilera's termination from his member firm. The firm disclosed that Aguilera was permitted to resign while under internal review for non-compliant social media posts.

Social media use by securities professionals is regulated because it can be used to make misleading claims, give unsuitable recommendations, or otherwise harm investors. When firms identify potentially problematic social media activity and the individual refuses to cooperate with the subsequent investigation, regulators cannot determine the extent of any harm.

Aguilera's refusal to provide the requested information and documents resulted in his permanent bar from the securities industry. This sanction reflects the seriousness with which FINRA treats non-cooperation, regardless of the underlying allegations.

Investors should be cautious about financial advice received through social media and verify that any investment professional they work with is properly registered and in good standing through FINRA's BrokerCheck at brokercheck.finra.org.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Teslim Osahon Belo-Osagie has been barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for refusing to produce information and documents requested by FINRA.

The investigation concerned Belo-Osagie's involvement in a business activity outside the scope of his relati...

Read More

According to FINRA, Teslim Osahon Belo-Osagie has been barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for refusing to produce information and documents requested by FINRA.

The investigation concerned Belo-Osagie's involvement in a business activity outside the scope of his relationship with his member firm. Outside business activities must be disclosed to firms and may require approval because they can create conflicts of interest or involve securities-related activities that require supervision.

When associated persons engage in undisclosed outside business activities, customers may not understand the person's role or the firm's lack of oversight. This can expose customers to risks they are unaware of and prevent them from making informed decisions.

Belo-Osagie's refusal to cooperate with FINRA's investigation prevented regulators from determining the nature and extent of his outside business activities and any potential harm to investors.

This case illustrates the importance of understanding your financial professional's outside activities. You can check an advisor's registration status and disclosed outside business activities through FINRA's BrokerCheck tool. Be cautious about any investment opportunities offered outside your advisor's firm.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Bhaskarray Bhupat Barot has been barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for refusing to appear for on-the-record testimony requested by FINRA.

The matter originated from FINRA's review of an amended Form U5 filed by Barot's former member firm disclosin...

Read More

According to FINRA, Bhaskarray Bhupat Barot has been barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for refusing to appear for on-the-record testimony requested by FINRA.

The matter originated from FINRA's review of an amended Form U5 filed by Barot's former member firm disclosing that he had been discharged. Form U5s are required when individuals leave firms and must disclose the circumstances of termination, including any discharge for cause.

When FINRA identifies concerning disclosures on Form U5s, it may investigate further to determine if violations occurred. On-the-record testimony is a critical investigative tool that allows regulators to question individuals directly about their conduct.

Barot's refusal to provide testimony prevented FINRA from fully investigating the circumstances surrounding his discharge. While the underlying facts remain unknown due to his non-cooperation, the refusal itself constitutes a serious violation warranting a permanent bar.

Investors can review their financial professional's Form U5 disclosures and employment history through FINRA's BrokerCheck. Terminations for cause and the reasons behind them provide important information about an advisor's history and trustworthiness.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Carlton Perry Fletcher has been barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for refusing to provide information and documents requested during an investigation.

The investigation concerned allegations that Fletcher converted funds of an individual. Conversi...

Read More

According to FINRA, Carlton Perry Fletcher has been barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for refusing to provide information and documents requested during an investigation.

The investigation concerned allegations that Fletcher converted funds of an individual. Conversion means taking someone else's money or property for personal use without authorization - essentially theft.

When FINRA receives allegations of conversion, it investigates to determine whether funds were misappropriated and to protect other potential victims. Fletcher's refusal to cooperate prevented FINRA from completing its investigation into these serious allegations.

While the bar is based on the failure to cooperate rather than a finding of conversion, the underlying allegations are extremely serious. Conversion is one of the most harmful violations in the securities industry because it involves direct theft from customers.

Investors should monitor their accounts carefully, verify that all transactions were authorized, and report any suspicious activity immediately. If you believe a financial professional has misappropriated your funds, contact both the firm and FINRA. The refusal to cooperate in this case prevented a determination of whether conversion occurred, but the bar ensures Fletcher can no longer work in the industry.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Daniel Ray Deno has been barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for refusing to provide documents and information and to appear for on-the-record testimony.

The investigation concerned allegations that Deno had engaged in felony fraud and theft. These ...

Read More

According to FINRA, Daniel Ray Deno has been barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for refusing to provide documents and information and to appear for on-the-record testimony.

The investigation concerned allegations that Deno had engaged in felony fraud and theft. These are among the most serious allegations that can be made against a securities professional, involving criminal conduct that directly harms investors.

Deno's complete refusal to cooperate - declining to provide documents, information, or testimony - prevented FINRA from investigating these serious allegations. Such comprehensive non-cooperation results in a permanent bar from the securities industry.

While FINRA could not complete its investigation due to the non-cooperation, the allegations themselves indicate the type of severe misconduct that investor protection rules are designed to prevent. Fraud and theft by financial professionals devastate victims financially and erode trust in the financial system.

Investors should be vigilant about their investments and account activity. If you suspect fraud or theft, document everything and report to your firm, FINRA, and potentially law enforcement. The industry bar ensures Deno cannot access investor accounts through registered positions.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Lonny Miller has been barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for refusing to appear for on-the-record testimony requested by FINRA.

The investigation concerned Miller's trading activity in a personal account held away from his member firm. The account ...

Read More

According to FINRA, Lonny Miller has been barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for refusing to appear for on-the-record testimony requested by FINRA.

The investigation concerned Miller's trading activity in a personal account held away from his member firm. The account generated an alert through FINRA's cross-market surveillance system, which monitors trading patterns across different markets to detect potential violations such as insider trading or market manipulation.

When surveillance systems flag unusual trading patterns, FINRA investigates to determine whether violations occurred. Miller's personal account activity triggered such an alert, but his refusal to provide testimony prevented FINRA from determining the nature and legality of his trading.

Securities professionals are required to disclose outside accounts and cooperate with regulatory investigations into their trading activity. Miller's refusal to do so resulted in his permanent removal from the industry.

This case illustrates that FINRA actively monitors trading across markets and investigates suspicious patterns. Investors benefit from this surveillance, which helps detect and deter market manipulation and insider trading that can harm ordinary investors.

Show Less