Bad Brokers

According to FINRA, Lek Securities Corporation (CRD #33135) of New City, New York, was expelled from FINRA membership and fined $1,130,000 pursuant to an Office of Hearing Officers (OHO) decision issued April 11, 2024, under FINRA Case #2021071137001. This decision has been appealed to the National ...

Read More

According to FINRA, Lek Securities Corporation (CRD #33135) of New City, New York, was expelled from FINRA membership and fined $1,130,000 pursuant to an Office of Hearing Officers (OHO) decision issued April 11, 2024, under FINRA Case #2021071137001. This decision has been appealed to the National Adjudicatory Council (NAC), and the sanctions are not in effect pending the completion of that review.

Lek Securities Corporation is accused of a broad pattern of regulatory violations. The firm allegedly accepted deposits and liquidated low-priced securities in violation of a business line suspension that had been imposed by FINRA. Additionally, the firm allegedly failed to implement 18 of the 98 recommendations made by an independent consultant retained as part of prior regulatory requirements. Despite this failure, the firm is accused of falsely certifying to FINRA that it had achieved full compliance with the consultant's recommendations.

Among the most serious allegations, the firm allegedly failed to develop and implement an adequate anti-money laundering (AML) program as required by the Bank Secrecy Act and FINRA rules. The firm is accused of failing to detect suspicious activities in customer accounts, including activities consistent with pump-and-dump schemes — a form of securities fraud in which bad actors artificially inflate the price of a stock through misleading promotions before selling their shares at the inflated price, leaving other investors with losses. The firm also allegedly failed to adequately supervise its low-priced securities business and willfully failed to retain records of unapproved communications as required by federal securities regulations.

Anti-money laundering compliance is one of the most critical obligations of any brokerage firm. AML programs are designed to prevent the financial system from being used to facilitate money laundering, terrorist financing, and other forms of financial crime. When a firm fails to implement adequate AML controls, it creates vulnerabilities that can be exploited by bad actors, potentially resulting in significant financial harm to innocent investors and the broader market.

For investors, this case demonstrates the importance of working with firms that maintain strong compliance programs and have clean regulatory records. Investors can research a firm's disciplinary history through FINRA's BrokerCheck tool before opening an account.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Charles Frederik Lek (CRD #4672129) of New York, New York, was barred from associating with any FINRA member firm in all capacities and fined $100,000 pursuant to an Office of Hearing Officers (OHO) decision issued April 11, 2024, under FINRA Case #2021071137001. This decision ha...

Read More

According to FINRA, Charles Frederik Lek (CRD #4672129) of New York, New York, was barred from associating with any FINRA member firm in all capacities and fined $100,000 pursuant to an Office of Hearing Officers (OHO) decision issued April 11, 2024, under FINRA Case #2021071137001. This decision has been appealed to the National Adjudicatory Council (NAC), and the sanctions are not in effect pending the completion of that review.

Charles Frederik Lek is accused of playing a central role in the regulatory violations committed by Lek Securities Corporation, where he served in a supervisory capacity. The allegations against him mirror the serious charges brought against the firm itself. Lek is accused of overseeing or permitting the firm to accept deposits and liquidate low-priced securities in violation of a FINRA-imposed business line suspension. He allegedly oversaw the firm's failure to implement 18 of 98 independent consultant recommendations and is accused of participating in the false certification to FINRA that the firm had fully complied with those recommendations.

Lek is further accused of failing to ensure that the firm developed and maintained an adequate anti-money laundering program. This failure allegedly allowed suspicious activities, including potential pump-and-dump schemes, to go undetected within customer accounts. He is also accused of failing to supervise the firm's low-priced securities business and of willfully failing to ensure that the firm retained records of unapproved communications as required by securities regulations.

The bar imposed against Lek — the most severe sanction FINRA can impose on an individual — reflects the breadth and seriousness of the alleged misconduct. A bar permanently prohibits an individual from working in any capacity with a FINRA member firm, effectively ending their career in the regulated securities industry. The additional $100,000 fine underscores the financial consequences that accompany such serious regulatory violations.

Because this matter is currently on appeal to the NAC, the sanctions have not yet taken effect. The NAC will conduct a de novo review of the OHO's findings and may affirm, modify, or reverse the decision.

For investors, this case highlights the critical importance of firm leadership and the tone set at the top of an organization. When supervisory personnel fail to enforce compliance obligations, the consequences can extend throughout the firm and potentially harm customers. Investors should research not only the firm they choose to work with but also the backgrounds of key individuals who oversee the firm's operations.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Thomas James Baumann (CRD #5254392) of Freeport, New York, has been named as a respondent in a FINRA complaint alleging that he failed to provide information and documents requested in connection with an investigation into unauthorized trading of equity securities in a customer a...

Read More

According to FINRA, Thomas James Baumann (CRD #5254392) of Freeport, New York, has been named as a respondent in a FINRA complaint alleging that he failed to provide information and documents requested in connection with an investigation into unauthorized trading of equity securities in a customer account (FINRA Case #2018056490310).

The complaint charges Baumann with failing to cooperate with FINRA's regulatory investigation, which is a serious obligation that all registered representatives must fulfill. Under FINRA rules, registered persons are required to provide information and documents to FINRA upon request during the course of an investigation. This duty to cooperate is a fundamental condition of being registered in the securities industry, and failure to comply can result in significant sanctions, including bars from the industry.

The underlying investigation relates to allegations of unauthorized trading of equity securities in a customer account. Unauthorized trading occurs when a broker executes transactions in a client's account without the client's prior knowledge or consent. This type of conduct, if proven, represents a serious violation of securities regulations and a breach of the trust that investors place in their financial professionals. FINRA Rule 2010 requires associated persons to observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade, and unauthorized trading is fundamentally inconsistent with these standards.

It is important to note that this matter is currently a complaint filing, meaning the allegations against Baumann have not yet been proven. As a respondent, Baumann is entitled to a hearing before a FINRA disciplinary panel, where he will have the opportunity to respond to the charges and present a defense. A complaint represents FINRA's formal charges but does not constitute a finding of wrongdoing.

Investors should understand that they have the right to authorize every transaction in their brokerage accounts unless they have granted discretionary authority in writing. If you notice trades in your account that you did not approve, you should contact your brokerage firm immediately and consider filing a complaint with FINRA. Monitoring account statements regularly is one of the most effective ways to detect unauthorized activity early and protect your investments.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Michael Charles Grande (CRD #1219255) of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, has been named as a respondent in a FINRA complaint alleging that he failed to provide information requested in connection with an investigation into the suitability of recommendations for short-term mutual fund t...

Read More

According to FINRA, Michael Charles Grande (CRD #1219255) of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, has been named as a respondent in a FINRA complaint alleging that he failed to provide information requested in connection with an investigation into the suitability of recommendations for short-term mutual fund trading, and that he failed to respond to multiple FINRA requests for information (FINRA Case #2018060128401).

The complaint charges Grande with two significant failures. First, he is accused of failing to cooperate with FINRA's investigation into whether his recommendations for short-term mutual fund trading were suitable for his clients. Second, he is alleged to have failed to respond to multiple requests from FINRA for information related to this investigation. Both of these failures represent serious breaches of a registered representative's obligations under FINRA rules.

Short-term mutual fund trading, sometimes called mutual fund switching, involves recommending that clients buy and sell mutual funds within relatively short time periods. This practice can be harmful to investors because mutual funds are generally designed as long-term investment vehicles, and frequent trading can generate unnecessary sales charges, fees, and tax consequences that erode investor returns. When a broker recommends short-term trading in mutual funds, regulators scrutinize whether those recommendations were suitable given the investor's financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance.

Under FINRA's suitability rules, brokers must have a reasonable basis to believe that their investment recommendations are appropriate for their clients. When the primary beneficiary of frequent mutual fund transactions is the broker rather than the investor through commissions generated, this raises serious regulatory concerns about whether the broker is acting in the client's best interest.

It is important to emphasize that this is a pending complaint and the allegations have not been adjudicated. Grande has the right to respond to the charges and present his defense before a FINRA hearing panel. A complaint filing does not represent a finding of wrongdoing.

Investors should be vigilant about the frequency of transactions in their accounts, particularly with mutual funds. If your broker is frequently recommending that you sell one mutual fund to purchase another, you should ask about the costs associated with these transactions and whether a buy-and-hold strategy might better serve your long-term financial goals.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Gary Francis Harpe (CRD #2983634) of Northville, Michigan, has been named as a respondent in a FINRA complaint alleging that he failed to provide information and documents requested in connection with an investigation into his termination, a felony charge of larceny by conversion...

Read More

According to FINRA, Gary Francis Harpe (CRD #2983634) of Northville, Michigan, has been named as a respondent in a FINRA complaint alleging that he failed to provide information and documents requested in connection with an investigation into his termination, a felony charge of larceny by conversion ($1,000-$20,000), and a possible failure to disclose judgments and liens (FINRA Case #2023077591501).

The allegations against Harpe are multifaceted and raise several serious regulatory concerns. First, the complaint charges him with failing to cooperate with FINRA's investigation by not providing requested information and documents. This obligation to cooperate is a cornerstone of securities industry regulation and applies to all registered persons, even after they have left the industry. Second, the underlying investigation itself involves troubling matters, including a felony charge for larceny by conversion, a criminal offense involving the unauthorized taking or misuse of property entrusted to the individual.

Larceny by conversion in the range of $1,000 to $20,000 is a significant criminal charge that reflects potential misappropriation of funds or property. Additionally, the investigation involves a possible failure to disclose judgments and liens on required regulatory filings. Registered representatives are obligated to disclose certain financial events, including unsatisfied judgments and liens, on their Form U4 registration documents. These disclosures are critical because they help regulators and the investing public assess the financial integrity and trustworthiness of securities professionals.

FINRA requires disclosure of these financial events because they can be indicators of financial distress that may create incentives for misconduct. When brokers fail to disclose material information, they deprive investors of the ability to make informed decisions about whom they trust with their money. Investors can check a broker's background, including disclosed judgments, liens, and criminal charges, through FINRA BrokerCheck.

It is critical to note that these are allegations contained in a pending complaint. Harpe has not been found guilty or liable, and he is entitled to a full hearing before a FINRA disciplinary panel. The filing of a complaint does not constitute a determination that any violation has occurred.

Investors should regularly review their broker's BrokerCheck profile and be aware that undisclosed financial or legal issues may indicate broader concerns about a financial professional's conduct and integrity.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Stephen James Sullivan (CRD #3123249) of Massapequa Park, New York, has been named as a respondent in a FINRA complaint alleging that he failed to provide complete on-the-record testimony and documents requested in connection with an investigation into potential churning and exce...

Read More

According to FINRA, Stephen James Sullivan (CRD #3123249) of Massapequa Park, New York, has been named as a respondent in a FINRA complaint alleging that he failed to provide complete on-the-record testimony and documents requested in connection with an investigation into potential churning and excessive trading (FINRA Case #2018056490311). The complaint further alleges that Sullivan threatened to terminate his testimony and refused to further participate in the investigation.

The charges against Sullivan are particularly concerning because they involve both a failure to cooperate with FINRA's investigative process and underlying allegations of churning and excessive trading. Churning occurs when a broker engages in excessive buying and selling of securities in a customer's account primarily to generate commissions for the broker rather than to benefit the investor. This practice is a serious violation of securities regulations and can cause substantial financial harm to investors through unnecessary transaction costs, tax liabilities, and poor investment performance.

Sullivan is accused of not only failing to provide complete testimony and documents but also of actively obstructing the investigation by threatening to terminate his testimony and refusing to continue participating. On-the-record testimony is a critical investigative tool that FINRA uses to gather facts and assess potential violations. When a registered person refuses to cooperate fully with this process, it undermines the regulatory framework designed to protect investors and maintain market integrity.

FINRA's ability to investigate potential misconduct depends on the cooperation of registered persons and associated individuals. The duty to provide testimony and documents is not optional; it is a fundamental requirement of registration in the securities industry. Refusal to cooperate can itself result in severe sanctions, including a bar from the industry, regardless of the outcome of the underlying investigation.

It is essential to note that this matter is a pending complaint, and the allegations have not been proven. Sullivan is entitled to respond to the charges and present a defense before a FINRA hearing panel.

Investors who suspect their accounts have been subject to excessive trading should review their account statements carefully, paying attention to the frequency and volume of transactions relative to their investment objectives. High turnover rates and cost-to-equity ratios are common indicators of potential churning activity.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Berchwood Partners LLC (CRD #108399) of New York, New York, was suspended from FINRA membership on April 9, 2024, pursuant to FINRA Rule 9552 for failure to provide information or keep information current as required by FINRA rules.

FINRA Rule 9552 provides an expedited procee...

Read More

According to FINRA, Berchwood Partners LLC (CRD #108399) of New York, New York, was suspended from FINRA membership on April 9, 2024, pursuant to FINRA Rule 9552 for failure to provide information or keep information current as required by FINRA rules.

FINRA Rule 9552 provides an expedited proceeding mechanism that allows FINRA to suspend a firm's membership when the firm fails to provide requested information or fails to keep its required regulatory filings current. This rule is designed to ensure that FINRA can effectively oversee its member firms and that the investing public has access to accurate, up-to-date information about the firms with which they do business.

Member firms are required to maintain current and accurate information in various regulatory filings, including their Form BD (Uniform Application for Broker-Dealer Registration) and other required documents. These filings contain essential information about the firm's business operations, its registered personnel, its financial condition, and any disciplinary history. When a firm fails to keep this information current, it compromises the integrity of the regulatory system and can deprive investors of material information they need to make informed decisions.

The suspension of Berchwood Partners LLC means that the firm is prohibited from conducting securities business during the suspension period. This action is significant because it directly impacts the firm's ability to operate and serve its clients. Suspensions under Rule 9552 can be lifted if the firm comes into compliance by providing the requested information or updating its filings.

This type of administrative action underscores the importance FINRA places on transparency and information sharing within the securities industry. Firms that fail to meet their regulatory obligations face real consequences that can affect their business operations and their clients.

Investors should be aware that they can check the registration status and disciplinary history of any FINRA member firm through FINRA BrokerCheck. If your brokerage firm has been suspended, you should inquire about the status of your accounts and consider whether your assets are adequately protected. Understanding the regulatory standing of your financial services providers is an important part of protecting your investments.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Melvin Securities, L.L.C. (CRD #29767) of Chicago, Illinois, was suspended from FINRA membership on April 11, 2024, pursuant to FINRA Rule 9552 for failure to provide information or keep information current as required by FINRA rules.

FINRA Rule 9552 authorizes FINRA to take e...

Read More

According to FINRA, Melvin Securities, L.L.C. (CRD #29767) of Chicago, Illinois, was suspended from FINRA membership on April 11, 2024, pursuant to FINRA Rule 9552 for failure to provide information or keep information current as required by FINRA rules.

FINRA Rule 9552 authorizes FINRA to take expedited action against member firms that fail to meet their regulatory obligations regarding the provision and maintenance of required information. Under this rule, FINRA issues a notice to the firm specifying the deficiency and providing a deadline for compliance. If the firm does not cure the deficiency within the prescribed timeframe, a suspension of membership automatically takes effect.

The requirement for member firms to provide timely and accurate information to FINRA serves several critical functions within the securities regulatory framework. It enables FINRA to conduct effective oversight of broker-dealer operations, ensures that the investing public has access to current information about firms and their registered representatives, and supports the overall integrity of the financial markets. When a firm fails to meet these requirements, it raises questions about the firm's commitment to regulatory compliance and investor protection.

A suspension under Rule 9552 prohibits the firm from engaging in securities business activities during the suspension period. This means the firm cannot execute trades, open new accounts, or conduct other brokerage operations until the suspension is lifted. The suspension can be terminated if the firm comes into compliance by providing the required information or updating its regulatory filings.

For clients of Melvin Securities, L.L.C., this suspension may have practical implications for their ability to access their accounts or execute transactions. Investors in this situation should contact the firm to understand the status of their accounts and may want to consider transferring their accounts to another FINRA member firm if the suspension is prolonged.

This administrative action highlights the importance of choosing a brokerage firm with a strong compliance record. Investors can use FINRA BrokerCheck to research the background and regulatory history of broker-dealer firms before opening an account, helping them make more informed decisions about where to place their trust and their assets.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Securities Capital Corporation (CRD #22892) of Birmingham, Alabama, was suspended from FINRA membership on April 9, 2024, pursuant to FINRA Rule 9552 for failure to provide information or keep information current as required by FINRA rules.

FINRA Rule 9552 is an expedited proc...

Read More

According to FINRA, Securities Capital Corporation (CRD #22892) of Birmingham, Alabama, was suspended from FINRA membership on April 9, 2024, pursuant to FINRA Rule 9552 for failure to provide information or keep information current as required by FINRA rules.

FINRA Rule 9552 is an expedited proceeding that allows FINRA to suspend a member firm when it fails to comply with its obligations to provide information or maintain accurate regulatory filings. This rule serves as an important enforcement mechanism to ensure that broker-dealer firms remain transparent and accountable to their regulator and, by extension, to the investing public.

Securities Capital Corporation's suspension means that the firm was found to have failed to meet one or more of its information-related obligations to FINRA. These obligations can include responding to FINRA requests for information during examinations or investigations, filing required financial reports, maintaining current registration information on Form BD, or keeping other regulatory filings up to date. The specific nature of the deficiency is addressed through the Rule 9552 process, which provides the firm with notice and an opportunity to cure the deficiency before the suspension takes effect.

During the period of suspension, Securities Capital Corporation is prohibited from conducting any securities business. This prohibition affects all aspects of the firm's brokerage operations, including executing trades, soliciting customers, and providing investment advice. The suspension remains in effect until the firm satisfies the requirements that gave rise to the action.

This type of regulatory action serves as an important reminder that FINRA takes information compliance seriously and that there are meaningful consequences for firms that fail to meet their obligations. The securities regulatory framework depends on the free flow of accurate information between regulators, firms, and investors, and any breakdown in this system can compromise investor protection.

Investors who have accounts with Securities Capital Corporation should verify the current status of the firm through FINRA BrokerCheck and take appropriate steps to ensure the safety of their investments. It is always advisable to maintain awareness of your brokerage firm's regulatory standing and to review your account statements and holdings regularly for any unusual activity.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Tellson Securities (CRD #286665) of Jacksonville, Florida, was suspended from FINRA membership on April 9, 2024, pursuant to FINRA Rule 9552 for failure to provide information or keep information current as required by FINRA rules.

FINRA Rule 9552 provides a streamlined enforc...

Read More

According to FINRA, Tellson Securities (CRD #286665) of Jacksonville, Florida, was suspended from FINRA membership on April 9, 2024, pursuant to FINRA Rule 9552 for failure to provide information or keep information current as required by FINRA rules.

FINRA Rule 9552 provides a streamlined enforcement mechanism that allows FINRA to suspend a member firm's registration when the firm fails to provide requested information or fails to maintain current and accurate regulatory filings. The rule is designed to address situations where firms are not meeting their basic compliance obligations, which can pose risks to investors and the integrity of the securities markets.

Tellson Securities' suspension indicates that the firm failed to satisfy one or more information-related requirements imposed by FINRA. Broker-dealer firms are subject to numerous ongoing reporting and disclosure obligations, including the timely filing of financial reports, the maintenance of accurate registration documents, and the prompt response to regulatory inquiries. These requirements exist to support FINRA's oversight mission and to ensure that investors and the public have access to reliable information about the firms that handle their money.

When a firm is suspended under Rule 9552, it is effectively barred from conducting any securities business until it remedies the deficiency that led to the suspension. This includes a prohibition on executing customer transactions, opening new accounts, and engaging in any other brokerage-related activities. The suspension is intended to serve both as a consequence for non-compliance and as an incentive for the firm to promptly address its regulatory obligations.

For investors with accounts at Tellson Securities, this suspension has direct practical implications. Customers may be unable to access certain account services or execute transactions during the suspension period. Affected investors should consider reaching out to the firm for information about the status of their accounts and explore the option of transferring their accounts to an active, properly registered broker-dealer.

Investors are encouraged to use FINRA BrokerCheck as a resource for verifying the registration status and disciplinary history of broker-dealer firms. Staying informed about your firm's regulatory standing is a key component of responsible investing and financial self-protection.

Show Less