Bad Brokers

According to FINRA, Jason Mark Kurtz (CRD #4958219), a registered representative based in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, was suspended from the securities industry effective January 4, 2024, for failure to comply with an arbitration award or related settlement pursuant to FINRA Rule Series 9554. The assoc...

Read More

According to FINRA, Jason Mark Kurtz (CRD #4958219), a registered representative based in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, was suspended from the securities industry effective January 4, 2024, for failure to comply with an arbitration award or related settlement pursuant to FINRA Rule Series 9554. The associated FINRA Arbitration Case number is 23-00417.

FINRA Rule Series 9554 provides for expedited proceedings against individuals who fail to comply with arbitration awards, settlements arising from arbitration proceedings, or orders of restitution. This rule is a cornerstone of investor protection because it ensures that the FINRA arbitration process, which is the primary means by which investors resolve disputes with their brokers, produces enforceable outcomes. If arbitration awards could be ignored without consequence, the entire dispute resolution system would fail to serve its intended purpose.

The arbitration case number, 23-00417, indicates that the underlying arbitration proceeding was initiated in 2023. The relatively short timeframe between the initiation of the arbitration and the suspension for non-compliance suggests that the case may have been resolved relatively quickly through a default or settlement, and that Kurtz failed to comply with the resulting obligation in a timely manner.

Jason Mark Kurtz's suspension means he is prohibited from associating with any FINRA member firm until the arbitration award is satisfied. During the suspension, Kurtz cannot conduct securities business, serve clients, or receive compensation related to securities activities. This restriction serves a dual purpose: it incentivizes Kurtz to comply with the arbitration award, and it protects investors from working with a professional who has demonstrated a disregard for their legal and regulatory obligations.

For investors, particularly those in the Oklahoma City area, this case illustrates the real-world consequences that brokers face when they fail to honor arbitration awards. The FINRA arbitration process is designed to provide investors with a fair and efficient means of recovering losses caused by broker misconduct, and FINRA takes the enforcement of arbitration awards seriously. Investors who have prevailed in arbitration proceedings and are having difficulty collecting on their awards should be aware that FINRA can take enforcement action under Rule 9554. Additionally, all investors should use FINRA's BrokerCheck tool to verify the regulatory standing of their financial professionals before entrusting them with their investments.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Leslie George Markus Jr. (CRD #2688964), a registered representative based in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, was suspended from the securities industry effective August 17, 2021, for failure to comply with an arbitration award or related settlement pursuant to FINRA Rule Series 9554. T...

Read More

According to FINRA, Leslie George Markus Jr. (CRD #2688964), a registered representative based in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, was suspended from the securities industry effective August 17, 2021, for failure to comply with an arbitration award or related settlement pursuant to FINRA Rule Series 9554. The suspension was subsequently lifted on January 26, 2024. The associated FINRA Case number is 20210709929, with related Arbitration Case number 20-01699.

FINRA Rule Series 9554 addresses the failure of registered individuals to comply with arbitration awards, related settlements, or orders of restitution. When an individual fails to pay an arbitration award, FINRA can suspend them from the securities industry until the award is satisfied. In this case, the suspension was in effect for approximately two and a half years before being lifted, indicating that Markus eventually came into compliance with the arbitration award.

The underlying arbitration case, 20-01699, appears to have originated in 2020, and the suspension was imposed in August 2021. The extended period of suspension from August 2021 to January 2024 represents a significant interruption in Markus's career in the securities industry. During this entire period, he was prohibited from conducting securities business, serving clients, or associating with any FINRA member firm.

The lifting of the suspension on January 26, 2024, indicates that Markus ultimately satisfied the arbitration award or otherwise reached a resolution acceptable to the claimant and FINRA. This outcome illustrates how Rule 9554 functions as an enforcement mechanism: by suspending an individual's ability to earn a livelihood in the securities industry, the rule creates a powerful incentive to comply with arbitration obligations.

For investors, this case demonstrates both the strengths and limitations of FINRA's arbitration enforcement system. On the positive side, the suspension mechanism ultimately resulted in compliance with the arbitration award, vindicating the rights of the investor who prevailed in arbitration. On the other hand, the two-and-a-half-year delay in compliance highlights the challenges investors can face in collecting on arbitration awards. Investors should be aware that while FINRA has effective tools for enforcing compliance, the process can take time. Investors who have won arbitration awards should remain persistent in pursuing collection and should work with FINRA and qualified legal counsel to explore all available avenues for enforcement. FINRA's BrokerCheck tool can help investors track the status of suspensions and other disciplinary actions.

Show Less

According to FINRA, David Jeffrey Morris (CRD #2522277), a registered representative based in Chicago, Illinois, was suspended from the securities industry effective January 11, 2024, for failure to comply with an arbitration award or related settlement pursuant to FINRA Rule Series 9554. The associ...

Read More

According to FINRA, David Jeffrey Morris (CRD #2522277), a registered representative based in Chicago, Illinois, was suspended from the securities industry effective January 11, 2024, for failure to comply with an arbitration award or related settlement pursuant to FINRA Rule Series 9554. The associated FINRA Arbitration Case number is 22-02085.

FINRA Rule Series 9554 provides for the suspension of registered individuals who fail to honor arbitration awards, settlements arising from arbitration, or orders of restitution. This rule is fundamental to the integrity of FINRA's dispute resolution program, which handles thousands of investor complaints each year. The arbitration process is designed to provide investors with a practical means of seeking recovery when they have been harmed by broker misconduct, and the enforceability of arbitration awards is essential to making this system work.

The arbitration case number, 22-02085, indicates that the underlying proceeding was initiated in 2022. The progression from the filing of the arbitration case to the suspension for non-compliance in January 2024 reflects a timeline in which the arbitration was completed, an award was issued, and Morris failed to satisfy the award within the required timeframe. FINRA then initiated expedited proceedings under Rule 9554 to suspend Morris until the award is paid.

David Jeffrey Morris's suspension means he is prohibited from conducting any securities business until the arbitration award is satisfied. He cannot associate with any FINRA member firm, serve clients, execute trades, or receive securities-related compensation. This restriction serves to protect investors by ensuring that a professional who has not honored his legal obligations is not permitted to continue serving the investing public.

Chicago, Illinois is one of the nation's largest financial centers, home to numerous brokerage firms and financial professionals. The suspension of a registered representative in this major market demonstrates that FINRA's enforcement actions reach all corners of the securities industry, including its most prominent markets.

For investors, this case reinforces the importance of FINRA's arbitration enforcement mechanisms. When investors prevail in arbitration and receive an award, they have a right to expect that the award will be paid. FINRA's willingness to suspend individuals who fail to comply demonstrates the organization's commitment to ensuring that arbitration awards are meaningful. Investors should always use FINRA's BrokerCheck tool to research the background of financial professionals and to check for any outstanding suspensions or disciplinary actions before making investment decisions.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Duncan Tyrel Sandlin (CRD #5847373), a registered representative based in Wilsonville, Oregon, was suspended from the securities industry effective July 22, 2019, for failure to comply with an arbitration award or related settlement pursuant to FINRA Rule Series 9554. The suspens...

Read More

According to FINRA, Duncan Tyrel Sandlin (CRD #5847373), a registered representative based in Wilsonville, Oregon, was suspended from the securities industry effective July 22, 2019, for failure to comply with an arbitration award or related settlement pursuant to FINRA Rule Series 9554. The suspension was subsequently lifted on January 11, 2024. The associated FINRA Arbitration Case number is 18-03775.

FINRA Rule Series 9554 authorizes FINRA to suspend registered individuals who fail to comply with arbitration awards, settlements related to arbitration proceedings, or orders of restitution. This enforcement mechanism is designed to ensure that arbitration awards are honored and that investors who prevail in arbitration proceedings actually receive the compensation they are owed. The suspension remains in effect until the individual satisfies the award or otherwise resolves the matter.

In the case of Duncan Tyrel Sandlin, the suspension was in effect for an extraordinarily long period, spanning approximately four and a half years from July 2019 to January 2024. The underlying arbitration case, 18-03775, was initiated in 2018, meaning this matter was pending in some form for nearly six years before final resolution. This extended timeline illustrates the challenges that can arise in enforcing arbitration awards and the persistence required by both FINRA and the affected investors.

The lifting of the suspension on January 11, 2024, indicates that Sandlin eventually came into compliance with the arbitration award. During the four-and-a-half-year suspension, Sandlin was prohibited from conducting any securities business, associating with any FINRA member firm, or receiving compensation related to securities activities. This prolonged exclusion from the industry represents a significant professional consequence and demonstrates the seriousness with which FINRA treats failures to comply with arbitration awards.

For investors, Sandlin's case offers both a cautionary tale and a measure of reassurance. The cautionary aspect is that even when investors prevail in arbitration, collection can be a lengthy and difficult process. The reassuring aspect is that FINRA maintains its suspension of non-compliant individuals until compliance is achieved, no matter how long it takes. This persistence helps ensure that the arbitration process has real consequences and that awards are not simply ignored.

Investors should use FINRA's BrokerCheck tool to research the full regulatory history of their financial professionals, including any past suspensions, even if those suspensions have been lifted. A history of non-compliance with arbitration awards may indicate patterns that are relevant to an investor's decision about whether to establish or continue a professional relationship.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Dawson James Securities, Inc. (CRD #130645) was censured and fined $500,000 for a series of regulatory failures related to electronic communications and due diligence obligations. The firm, based in Boca Raton, Florida, was found in violation of FINRA rules for failing to preserv...

Read More

According to FINRA, Dawson James Securities, Inc. (CRD #130645) was censured and fined $500,000 for a series of regulatory failures related to electronic communications and due diligence obligations. The firm, based in Boca Raton, Florida, was found in violation of FINRA rules for failing to preserve business-related text messages sent and received by its associated persons, and for failing to supervise the use of text messaging across the firm.

In addition to the recordkeeping failures, FINRA found that Dawson James Securities failed to conduct reasonable due diligence reviews of private placement offerings sold through the firm. Private placements are securities offerings that are exempt from full SEC registration and are often sold to a limited number of investors. Because these offerings carry heightened risk due to limited disclosure requirements, broker-dealers have an obligation under FINRA rules to perform thorough due diligence before recommending or selling these products to investors. The firm's failure to do so exposed investors to potential harm from inadequately vetted investment products.

FINRA also found that the firm maintained deficient written supervisory procedures (WSPs). WSPs are the internal compliance documents that outline how a firm monitors and ensures adherence to securities laws and industry regulations. When a firm's WSPs are inadequate, it signals a broader breakdown in the compliance infrastructure meant to protect investors.

The failure to preserve text messages is particularly significant in the modern regulatory environment. FINRA and the SEC have increasingly focused on off-channel communications, recognizing that business conducted through text messages, messaging apps, and other informal channels must be captured and retained just as traditional email correspondence is. When firms fail to preserve these communications, regulators lose the ability to reconstruct conversations that may be critical to investigating potential misconduct.

For investors, this case highlights several important lessons. First, firms that fail to maintain proper records may be hiding problematic conduct or simply lack the compliance infrastructure needed to protect clients. Second, the due diligence failures associated with private placements underscore the importance of asking questions about how your broker-dealer evaluates the investment products it offers. Third, supervisory failures often indicate systemic issues within a firm rather than isolated incidents. Investors should review their firm's regulatory history through FINRA BrokerCheck before entrusting their assets to any financial professional or firm. This enforcement action was resolved on April 5, 2024, under FINRA Case #2020065100701.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Robert Dawson Keyser Jr. (CRD #1291503), an individual associated with Dawson James Securities, Inc. in Boca Raton, Florida, was fined $10,000 and suspended from associating with any FINRA member firm in all capacities for one month. Keyser was found in violation of FINRA rules f...

Read More

According to FINRA, Robert Dawson Keyser Jr. (CRD #1291503), an individual associated with Dawson James Securities, Inc. in Boca Raton, Florida, was fined $10,000 and suspended from associating with any FINRA member firm in all capacities for one month. Keyser was found in violation of FINRA rules for causing the firm to maintain inaccurate books and records.

The requirement that broker-dealers maintain accurate books and records is one of the foundational principles of securities regulation. Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and related FINRA rules, firms must keep precise records of their business activities, financial condition, and customer transactions. When an individual causes a firm to maintain inaccurate records, it undermines the integrity of the entire regulatory framework designed to protect investors and maintain market confidence.

Keyser's violations were part of a broader enforcement action against Dawson James Securities, which was separately censured and fined $500,000 for related failures including the failure to preserve business-related text messages, supervisory deficiencies, and inadequate due diligence on private placement offerings. The fact that both the firm and an individual were sanctioned in this matter illustrates FINRA's approach of holding both institutions and the people responsible for compliance failures accountable.

Books and records violations can have far-reaching consequences. Inaccurate records can mask financial problems at a firm, conceal unsuitable trading activity, or prevent regulators from identifying misconduct. For investors, accurate recordkeeping is essential because it forms the basis for account statements, trade confirmations, and other documents that investors rely on to monitor their investments.

The one-month suspension imposed on Keyser, while relatively brief, serves as a meaningful disciplinary measure. During the suspension period, Keyser was prohibited from functioning in any capacity at any FINRA member firm, effectively removing him from the securities industry temporarily.

Investors should understand that when regulators identify books and records violations, it may indicate deeper problems within a firm's compliance culture. Reviewing a broker's disciplinary history on FINRA BrokerCheck can help investors make informed decisions about whom they trust with their financial futures. This enforcement action was resolved on April 5, 2024, under FINRA Case #2020065100701.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Cobra Trading, Inc. (CRD #132078), a broker-dealer based in Carrollton, Texas, was censured and fined $200,000 for violations related to its use of social media influencers to promote the firm's services. The action, resolved on April 3, 2024, found that Cobra Trading paid influe...

Read More

According to FINRA, Cobra Trading, Inc. (CRD #132078), a broker-dealer based in Carrollton, Texas, was censured and fined $200,000 for violations related to its use of social media influencers to promote the firm's services. The action, resolved on April 3, 2024, found that Cobra Trading paid influencers to create and distribute promotional communications on social media that were unfair and unbalanced, failed to approve or preserve influencer video content, and failed to supervise influencer-generated retail communications.

Social media influencer marketing has become a significant channel for financial services firms seeking to reach new audiences, particularly younger investors. However, FINRA rules require that all communications with the public, including those made by paid influencers on behalf of a firm, meet the same standards of fairness, balance, and accuracy as traditional advertising. This means that promotional content must present a balanced view that includes appropriate risk disclosures and does not make exaggerated or misleading claims.

Cobra Trading's failure to approve influencer content before it was published represents a serious supervisory lapse. Under FINRA Rule 2210, a registered principal must review and approve retail communications before they are used. By allowing influencers to post promotional videos without prior review, the firm lost control over the messaging being delivered to potential investors, creating the risk that misleading or non-compliant information would reach the public.

Equally concerning was the firm's failure to preserve the influencer videos. FINRA's recordkeeping requirements mandate that firms retain copies of all communications with the public. When influencer content is not preserved, regulators cannot review the communications for compliance, and there is no audit trail to assess whether investors were harmed by misleading claims.

This case is particularly relevant for investors who discover financial products or services through social media. Investors should approach influencer-promoted financial content with caution, recognizing that paid promoters may not present a complete or balanced picture of risks and costs. Just because a financial product is promoted by a popular social media personality does not mean the investment is suitable or that all material risks have been disclosed. Investors are encouraged to conduct independent research and consult FINRA BrokerCheck before opening accounts based on social media promotions. This action was resolved under FINRA Case #2021072501001.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Murray Securities, Inc. (CRD #142783), a broker-dealer based in Tyler, Texas, was censured and fined $35,000 for willfully violating Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) and related compliance failures. The action was resolved on April 8, 2024.

Regulation Best Interest, which too...

Read More

According to FINRA, Murray Securities, Inc. (CRD #142783), a broker-dealer based in Tyler, Texas, was censured and fined $35,000 for willfully violating Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) and related compliance failures. The action was resolved on April 8, 2024.

Regulation Best Interest, which took effect on June 30, 2020, requires broker-dealers to act in the best interest of retail customers when making securities recommendations. A critical component of Reg BI is the Compliance Obligation, which requires firms to establish, maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to achieve compliance with the regulation. FINRA found that Murray Securities willfully failed to establish these required written policies and procedures, a fundamental failure that calls into question the firm's commitment to putting customers' interests first.

The use of the term "willfully" in FINRA's findings is significant. A willful violation means that the firm intentionally engaged in the conduct that constituted the violation, as opposed to an inadvertent or negligent failure. Willful violations of Reg BI can carry additional consequences, including potential statutory disqualification from the securities industry.

Murray Securities was also found in violation of Form CRS requirements. Form CRS, or the Customer Relationship Summary, is a disclosure document that broker-dealers and investment advisers must deliver to retail investors. It provides key information about the firm's services, fees, conflicts of interest, and disciplinary history in a standardized, easy-to-understand format. Failure to comply with Form CRS requirements deprives investors of critical information they need to make informed decisions about their financial relationships.

Additionally, the firm maintained deficient written supervisory procedures (WSPs). WSPs serve as the compliance roadmap for a firm, outlining how the firm monitors its operations and ensures adherence to regulatory requirements. When WSPs are deficient, it often signals broader compliance weaknesses.

For investors, this case underscores the importance of Regulation Best Interest as a protective standard. Investors should ask their brokers how the firm ensures compliance with Reg BI and whether they have received a Form CRS document. If a firm cannot clearly articulate how it meets its best interest obligations, that may be a warning sign. Investors can review a firm's compliance history through FINRA BrokerCheck. This action was resolved under FINRA Case #2021069350301.

Show Less

According to FINRA, DAI Securities, LLC (formerly known as Lewis Financial Group, L.C., CRD #36673), a broker-dealer based in Atlanta, Georgia, was censured, fined $50,000, and ordered to pay $25,500 in restitution to affected investors. The action was resolved on April 10, 2024.

FINRA found that...

Read More

According to FINRA, DAI Securities, LLC (formerly known as Lewis Financial Group, L.C., CRD #36673), a broker-dealer based in Atlanta, Georgia, was censured, fined $50,000, and ordered to pay $25,500 in restitution to affected investors. The action was resolved on April 10, 2024.

FINRA found that DAI Securities negligently failed to inform investors that the issuer of a securities product had failed to make timely filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including audited financial statements. The firm also sold approximately $300,000 in limited partnership interests without disclosing this material information to purchasers.

Timely SEC filings, particularly audited financial statements, are among the most important sources of information available to investors. These filings provide transparency into a company's financial health, operations, and risk factors. When an issuer fails to make these filings on time, it raises serious red flags about the company's financial condition and governance. A broker-dealer that is aware of such filing deficiencies has an obligation to disclose this information to investors before selling the issuer's securities.

Limited partnership interests are a type of investment that often involves illiquid assets and limited ongoing disclosure compared to publicly traded securities. Investors in limited partnerships are particularly dependent on their broker-dealer to provide accurate and complete information, because these investments typically cannot be easily sold on a secondary market if problems arise. The failure to disclose that the issuer was behind on its SEC filings deprived investors of information that could have materially affected their decision to invest.

The $25,500 restitution order is designed to compensate investors who were harmed by the firm's negligent failure to disclose. While the restitution amount may not fully cover all investor losses, it represents a recognition by FINRA that investors suffered financial harm as a result of the firm's conduct.

For investors, this case serves as an important reminder to ask questions about the securities being offered to them, particularly in private placements and limited partnerships. Investors should inquire whether the issuer is current on all regulatory filings and request copies of recent audited financial statements before investing. Checking FINRA BrokerCheck for a firm's disciplinary history can also provide valuable context about a firm's compliance track record. This action was resolved under FINRA Case #2018060895201.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Barclays Capital Inc. (CRD #19714), a major broker-dealer based in New York, New York, was censured and fined $700,000 for multiple violations related to the supervision of research analyst trading activities and disclosure obligations in equity research reports. The action was r...

Read More

According to FINRA, Barclays Capital Inc. (CRD #19714), a major broker-dealer based in New York, New York, was censured and fined $700,000 for multiple violations related to the supervision of research analyst trading activities and disclosure obligations in equity research reports. The action was resolved on April 12, 2024.

FINRA found that Barclays Capital failed to supervise research analyst trading in external managed accounts, which are investment accounts managed by third parties on behalf of the analyst. Research analysts occupy a uniquely sensitive position in the securities industry because their published opinions can influence the trading decisions of institutional and retail investors. For this reason, FINRA and SEC rules impose strict limitations on analysts' personal trading activities, particularly in securities they cover.

The firm was also found to have failed to restrict trading in covered securities. Under NASD Rule 2711 and FINRA Rule 2241, research analysts are prohibited from trading in securities of companies they cover during certain blackout periods, such as around the time research reports are published. These restrictions exist to prevent analysts from profiting from their own recommendations and to maintain the integrity and objectivity of research.

Additionally, Barclays Capital failed to disclose research analyst financial interests in its research reports. When an analyst has a financial interest in a security being recommended, that information must be prominently disclosed so that readers can evaluate whether the analyst's opinion may be influenced by personal financial considerations. The firm also failed to disclose affiliate compensation in equity research reports, meaning that readers were not informed when Barclays or its affiliates had received compensation from the companies being covered.

These disclosure failures are particularly significant because investors rely on research reports to make informed investment decisions. When material conflicts of interest are not disclosed, investors may give undue weight to recommendations that are influenced by undisclosed financial relationships.

For investors, this case highlights the importance of critically evaluating research reports and understanding the potential conflicts of interest that may exist. Investors should look for conflict-of-interest disclosures in research reports and consider seeking multiple independent sources of analysis before making investment decisions. This action was resolved under FINRA Case #2019062059301.

Show Less