Bad Brokers

According to FINRA, Thakoor Ben Balkaran (CRD #2506670), based in North Merrick, New York, was sanctioned on January 25, 2024, through a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC). Balkaran was fined $5,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member firm in all capacities for one month...

Read More

According to FINRA, Thakoor Ben Balkaran (CRD #2506670), based in North Merrick, New York, was sanctioned on January 25, 2024, through a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC). Balkaran was fined $5,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member firm in all capacities for one month.

FINRA found that Balkaran falsely certified to the State of New York that he had personally completed 15 hours of continuing education required to renew his state insurance license when, in fact, another person had completed that continuing education on his behalf.

Continuing education requirements are a fundamental component of professional licensing in the financial services industry. These requirements exist to ensure that licensed professionals maintain current knowledge of industry regulations, products, and best practices. By requiring ongoing education, regulators help ensure that the professionals serving the investing and insured public remain competent and informed throughout their careers.

When a registered representative has someone else complete their continuing education, it defeats the entire purpose of these requirements. The individual who is supposed to be gaining updated knowledge and skills simply bypasses the process entirely. This means that the representative may lack awareness of important regulatory changes, new product risks, or evolving best practices that could directly affect the quality of service they provide to their clients.

False certification is also a matter of basic integrity. The certification process requires the individual to affirmatively represent that they personally completed the education. Making a false statement in this context demonstrates a willingness to be dishonest with regulators, which raises broader questions about the individual's trustworthiness in handling client matters.

Balkaran's case was part of a broader pattern identified by FINRA in this reporting period, in which multiple registered representatives in New York were found to have had others complete their insurance continuing education on their behalf. This pattern suggests the practice may have been more widespread than isolated, prompting FINRA to take enforcement action against each individual involved.

For investors, this case is a reminder that the professionals managing your finances and insurance products are required to meet ongoing educational standards. If you are concerned about whether your financial professional is maintaining proper licensing and education, you can verify their credentials through FINRA's BrokerCheck and your state's insurance department.

The suspension was in effect from February 20, 2024, through March 19, 2024 (FINRA Case #2023079746101).

Show Less

According to FINRA, Charles Jay Gross (CRD #2120578), based in Monsey, New York, was sanctioned on January 25, 2024, through a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC). Gross was fined $5,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member firm in all capacities for one month.

FINRA fo...

Read More

According to FINRA, Charles Jay Gross (CRD #2120578), based in Monsey, New York, was sanctioned on January 25, 2024, through a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC). Gross was fined $5,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member firm in all capacities for one month.

FINRA found that Gross falsely certified to the State of New York that he had personally completed 15 hours of continuing education required to renew his state insurance license when, in fact, another person had completed that continuing education on his behalf.

Continuing education is a mandatory requirement for maintaining professional licenses in the financial services industry. These programs are designed to keep licensed professionals up to date on evolving regulations, product developments, and ethical standards. The certification process requires the individual to personally attest that they completed the required coursework, making any false statement a direct misrepresentation to state regulators.

The act of having another person complete continuing education on a representative's behalf is troubling on multiple levels. First, it means the representative has not acquired the knowledge that the educational program was designed to impart. This could result in gaps in the representative's understanding of current regulatory requirements, product risks, or compliance obligations. Second, the false certification itself demonstrates a disregard for the honesty and integrity expected of financial professionals, which are qualities that clients depend on when entrusting someone with their financial affairs.

This case was part of a series of similar enforcement actions taken by FINRA against multiple registered representatives in New York who engaged in the same conduct. The fact that multiple individuals were identified suggests that FINRA conducted a focused investigation into this type of misconduct and is committed to holding each individual accountable.

For investors, this enforcement action serves as a reminder of the importance of working with financial professionals who take their regulatory obligations seriously. Continuing education requirements are not mere formalities; they are safeguards designed to ensure that the people advising you are qualified to do so. Investors can check their broker's licensing status and disciplinary history through FINRA's BrokerCheck tool, which is freely available to the public. Staying informed about your broker's background is one of the most effective ways to protect your financial interests.

The suspension was in effect from February 20, 2024, through March 19, 2024 (FINRA Case #2023079746301).

Show Less

According to FINRA, Barbara Suzan Savin (CRD #2123585), based in Massapequa, New York, was sanctioned on January 25, 2024, through a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC). Savin was fined $5,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member firm in all capacities for one month.

FI...

Read More

According to FINRA, Barbara Suzan Savin (CRD #2123585), based in Massapequa, New York, was sanctioned on January 25, 2024, through a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC). Savin was fined $5,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member firm in all capacities for one month.

FINRA found that Savin falsely certified to the State of New York that she had personally completed 15 hours of continuing education required to renew her state insurance license when, in fact, another person had completed that continuing education on her behalf.

Insurance continuing education requirements serve a vital consumer protection function. They ensure that licensed professionals remain informed about changes in laws, regulations, products, and ethical standards that affect their ability to serve clients competently. When a representative circumvents these requirements by having someone else complete the coursework, the educational purpose is entirely defeated, and the public is left being served by a professional who may not possess current knowledge essential to their role.

The false certification aspect of this violation adds a separate dimension of concern. By certifying that she personally completed the education, Savin made a false statement to the State of New York. Honesty and forthrightness with regulators are fundamental obligations of every registered representative. The securities industry depends on a framework of trust, and when professionals make false representations to regulators, it erodes the integrity of that framework.

Savin's case was one of several similar actions taken by FINRA during this reporting period, all involving New York-based registered representatives who had others complete their insurance continuing education. The coordinated enforcement effort demonstrates FINRA's commitment to addressing this type of misconduct systematically.

For investors, the key takeaway is that continuing education requirements exist to protect you. They help ensure that the financial professionals managing your money and insurance products are competent and current in their knowledge. When these requirements are bypassed, the protections they are designed to provide are compromised. Investors should be proactive about verifying their financial professionals' credentials and disciplinary history. FINRA's BrokerCheck tool provides free access to information about a broker's registration status, employment history, and any regulatory or disciplinary events. Taking a few minutes to review this information can provide valuable insight into whether the professional handling your finances is meeting their obligations.

The suspension was in effect from February 20, 2024, through March 19, 2024 (FINRA Case #2023079740701).

Show Less

According to FINRA, James V. Scheidel Jr. (CRD #4489589), based in Islip, New York, was sanctioned on January 26, 2024, through a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC). Scheidel was fined $5,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member firm in all capacities for one month.

FI...

Read More

According to FINRA, James V. Scheidel Jr. (CRD #4489589), based in Islip, New York, was sanctioned on January 26, 2024, through a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC). Scheidel was fined $5,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member firm in all capacities for one month.

FINRA found that Scheidel falsely certified to the State of New York that he had personally completed 15 hours of continuing education required to renew his state insurance license when, in fact, another person had completed that continuing education on his behalf.

The requirement for financial professionals to personally complete continuing education is not merely an administrative formality. It is a substantive regulatory safeguard designed to ensure that individuals entrusted with managing clients' financial affairs remain current in their knowledge of applicable laws, regulations, products, and ethical standards. The 15-hour requirement imposed by the State of New York reflects the minimum educational investment deemed necessary to maintain professional competency on an ongoing basis.

When a registered representative has another person complete this education, the representative foregoes the opportunity to learn about important developments that could directly affect how they serve their clients. This could include changes to insurance regulations, updates to disclosure requirements, new product risks, or evolving standards of professional conduct. The potential consequences for clients are real, as a representative who is not current in their knowledge may provide advice or make recommendations that do not reflect the latest regulatory requirements or best practices.

The false certification is equally concerning from an integrity standpoint. Financial professionals occupy positions of trust, and their willingness to make false statements to state regulators calls into question whether that trust is well placed. Clients rely on their brokers and insurance agents to be honest and transparent, and regulatory bodies rely on certifications to be accurate.

This action was part of a series of similar enforcement actions taken by FINRA, indicating that the practice of having others complete continuing education may have been more widespread than a single isolated incident. FINRA's coordinated approach to enforcement in these cases sends a clear message that this type of conduct will not be tolerated.

Investors should verify their financial professional's licensing and disciplinary status through FINRA's BrokerCheck and their state's insurance regulatory agency to ensure they are working with properly credentialed professionals.

The suspension was in effect from February 20, 2024, through March 19, 2024 (FINRA Case #2023079739901).

Show Less

According to FINRA, Willie J. Rosser Sr. (CRD #6139449), based in Atlanta, Georgia, was sanctioned on January 30, 2024, through a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC). Rosser was assessed a deferred fine of $5,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member firm in all capacities ...

Read More

According to FINRA, Willie J. Rosser Sr. (CRD #6139449), based in Atlanta, Georgia, was sanctioned on January 30, 2024, through a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC). Rosser was assessed a deferred fine of $5,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member firm in all capacities for 45 days.

FINRA found that Rosser borrowed a total of $19,000 from two of his customers, who were personal friends, without notifying or obtaining prior written approval from his member firm. The findings also stated that on an annual compliance questionnaire he submitted to the firm, Rosser denied having borrowed money from any customers, despite having already obtained these loans.

FINRA noted that Rosser has made timely repayments of the loans and neither customer has complained about the arrangements.

FINRA Rule 3240 strictly regulates borrowing and lending arrangements between registered representatives and their customers. The rule requires that the member firm have written procedures permitting such arrangements, that the lending arrangement meet specified conditions, and that the firm provide prior written approval. These requirements apply even when the broker and customer have a personal relationship outside the brokerage context.

The rationale behind these rules is straightforward: when a broker borrows money from a customer, it creates a financial dependency that can compromise the broker's objectivity and independence. A broker who owes money to a customer may feel pressure to generate returns or take risks that serve the broker's financial interests rather than the customer's. The relationship dynamic shifts from one of professional service to one of financial obligation, which can cloud judgment and undermine the duty of care the broker owes the client.

The false statement on the compliance questionnaire adds a separate layer of misconduct. Compliance questionnaires are internal controls designed to help firms detect and manage potential conflicts of interest and rule violations. By denying the loans on the questionnaire, Rosser actively concealed the borrowing arrangements from his firm, depriving the compliance department of the opportunity to evaluate and address the situation.

For investors, this case is a reminder that financial professionals are generally prohibited from borrowing money from their clients unless strict conditions are met. If your broker or financial advisor asks to borrow money, treat it as a serious red flag and report it to the firm's compliance department. Even when the broker is a personal friend, the professional relationship requires adherence to regulatory standards that protect your interests.

The suspension was in effect from February 5, 2024, through March 20, 2024 (FINRA Case #2022074772401).

Show Less

According to FINRA, Bruce Allen Rathkamp (CRD #1358696), based in Chillicothe, Ohio, was sanctioned on January 31, 2024, through a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC). Rathkamp was fined $5,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member firm in all capacities for four months.

...

Read More

According to FINRA, Bruce Allen Rathkamp (CRD #1358696), based in Chillicothe, Ohio, was sanctioned on January 31, 2024, through a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC). Rathkamp was fined $5,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member firm in all capacities for four months.

FINRA found that Rathkamp forged or falsified the electronic signatures of customers, some of whom were seniors, on account documents, and forged the electronic signature of another registered representative on some of the documents. As a result, Rathkamp caused his member firm to maintain inaccurate books and records.

The findings stated that the documents signed by Rathkamp included account applications and account transfer forms, which were required books and records of the firm. FINRA noted that none of the customers complained and the underlying transactions, which did not generate any commissions for Rathkamp, were authorized. However, Rathkamp also falsely attested to his firm on a compliance questionnaire that he had not signed or affixed another person's signature on a document.

Signature forgery on account documents is a serious violation of FINRA rules and securities regulations, regardless of whether the underlying transactions were authorized. Customer signatures on account documents serve as verification that the customer has reviewed, understood, and agreed to the terms of the transaction or account change. By forging these signatures, Rathkamp deprived customers of this important safeguard and caused the firm to maintain records that were fundamentally inaccurate.

The forgery of another registered representative's signature adds an additional dimension to the violation. It means that supervisory and compliance functions dependent on knowing which representatives approved or participated in particular transactions were compromised.

The involvement of senior customers is particularly concerning given FINRA's heightened focus on protecting older investors. Seniors are recognized as a vulnerable population that deserves additional safeguards, and forging their signatures on financial documents is especially troubling from a regulatory perspective.

The false attestation on the compliance questionnaire compounds the seriousness of the misconduct. By affirmatively stating that he had not signed another person's name on documents, Rathkamp actively concealed his conduct and undermined his firm's compliance program.

Investors should review all documents associated with their accounts to ensure they contain only their own authentic signatures. If you discover unauthorized signatures on your account documents, contact your firm's compliance department immediately and consider filing a complaint with FINRA.

The suspension was in effect from February 5, 2024, through June 4, 2024 (FINRA Case #2022075368501).

Show Less

According to FINRA, Austin Richard Dutton Jr. (CRD #2739167), based in Furlong, Pennsylvania, was named as a respondent in a FINRA complaint filed on January 5, 2024. It is important to note that the issuance of a disciplinary complaint represents the initiation of a formal proceeding in which findi...

Read More

According to FINRA, Austin Richard Dutton Jr. (CRD #2739167), based in Furlong, Pennsylvania, was named as a respondent in a FINRA complaint filed on January 5, 2024. It is important to note that the issuance of a disciplinary complaint represents the initiation of a formal proceeding in which findings as to the allegations have not been made, and does not represent a decision as to any of the allegations contained in the complaint.

Dutton is alleged to have recommended that customers, most of whom were retired or approaching retirement, purchase illiquid alternative investments without having a reasonable basis to believe that these purchases were suitable for each of the customers. The complaint alleges that the alternative investments were all speculative investments that involved a high degree of risk. However, as the customers informed Dutton, none of them were seeking to make speculative, high-risk investments. Each of the customers reportedly had limited or no investment experience and none had ever purchased alternative investments. Many relied on their savings for income, and none were able to financially bear the risks associated with alternative investments. Nevertheless, Dutton is accused of recommending that the customers use a significant portion of their retirement savings to purchase these products.

The complaint alleges that Dutton's recommendations were unsuitable based on the customers' investment profiles, including their net worths, investable assets, annual incomes, investment objectives, and risk tolerances. Dutton allegedly generated more than $72,000 in commissions from these recommendations.

Dutton is also charged with falsifying his member firm's books and records, causing numerous documents including new account documents, Direct Business Profile and Agreement forms, Accredited Investor Forms, and Suitability Forms to contain false and inaccurate information regarding customers' suitability profiles and purchases.

Additionally, the complaint alleges that Dutton failed to respond to FINRA's requests for information and documents in connection with its investigation, and in a separate investigation into whether he engaged in a private securities transaction. Dutton reportedly responded to one request only after the near-completion of a FINRA Rule 9552 proceeding that would have resulted in his bar from the industry.

Investors should understand that these are allegations that have not yet been proven. However, this case illustrates the importance of understanding the risks of alternative investments and ensuring that any recommendations made by a financial professional align with your stated investment objectives and risk tolerance. Investors can monitor the progress of this case through FINRA's Disciplinary Actions Online search tool.

(FINRA Case #2018059178401)

Show Less

According to FINRA, CVEX Markets LLC (CRD #311448), a broker-dealer firm based in Austin, Texas, was suspended effective January 5, 2024, for failure to provide information or keep information current pursuant to FINRA Rule 9552.

FINRA Rule 9552 is a critical regulatory mechanism that ensures bro...

Read More

According to FINRA, CVEX Markets LLC (CRD #311448), a broker-dealer firm based in Austin, Texas, was suspended effective January 5, 2024, for failure to provide information or keep information current pursuant to FINRA Rule 9552.

FINRA Rule 9552 is a critical regulatory mechanism that ensures broker-dealer firms comply with their obligation to provide information requested by FINRA during the course of examinations, investigations, or other regulatory inquiries. When FINRA requests information from a member firm, that firm is required to respond fully and promptly. Failure to do so triggers the expedited proceedings outlined in Rule 9552, which can result in suspension of the firm's membership.

The suspension of CVEX Markets LLC under this rule indicates that the firm failed to respond to FINRA's requests for information within the required timeframe. This is a serious matter because FINRA's ability to regulate the securities industry depends on the cooperation of its member firms. When a firm refuses or fails to provide requested information, it undermines the regulatory process and raises concerns about what the firm may be concealing from regulators.

A suspension under Rule 9552 means that CVEX Markets LLC was prohibited from conducting securities business during the period of the suspension. This has significant consequences not only for the firm itself but also for any customers who may have had accounts or pending transactions with the firm. Clients of a suspended firm may experience delays in accessing their accounts or completing transactions.

For investors, this case serves as an important reminder to research the regulatory history of any broker-dealer firm before entrusting them with their investments. FINRA's BrokerCheck tool, available online at no cost, allows investors to look up the disciplinary history of both firms and individual brokers. A firm that has been suspended for failing to provide information to regulators is a significant red flag.

Investors should also understand that FINRA's information requests are a fundamental part of investor protection. These requests often stem from investigations into potential misconduct, and when a firm refuses to cooperate, it may indicate deeper problems at the firm. Maintaining awareness of these regulatory actions helps investors make informed decisions about where to place their trust and their money.

Show Less

According to FINRA, CVEX Markets LLC (CRD #311448), a broker-dealer firm based in Austin, Texas, was suspended effective January 2, 2024, for failure to meet eligibility or qualifications standards or prerequisites for access to services pursuant to FINRA Rule 9555. The associated FINRA Case number ...

Read More

According to FINRA, CVEX Markets LLC (CRD #311448), a broker-dealer firm based in Austin, Texas, was suspended effective January 2, 2024, for failure to meet eligibility or qualifications standards or prerequisites for access to services pursuant to FINRA Rule 9555. The associated FINRA Case number is 2023080382001.

FINRA Rule 9555 provides for expedited proceedings when a member firm fails to meet the eligibility or qualification standards required to maintain its FINRA membership or access FINRA services. These standards encompass a range of requirements, including maintaining proper net capital, filing timely financial reports, maintaining required insurance or fidelity bonds, and meeting other operational prerequisites. When a firm falls out of compliance with these fundamental requirements, FINRA can move swiftly to suspend the firm's membership to protect the investing public.

The suspension of CVEX Markets LLC under Rule 9555 is particularly noteworthy because this firm was also suspended under Rule 9552 just three days later, on January 5, 2024, for failure to provide information. The combination of these two suspensions paints a concerning picture of a firm that was not meeting its basic regulatory obligations. When a firm fails to meet eligibility standards and simultaneously fails to provide requested information, it raises serious questions about the firm's operational integrity and commitment to compliance.

Eligibility standards exist to ensure that only qualified and properly capitalized firms are permitted to engage in securities business with the public. These standards serve as a first line of defense for investors, helping to ensure that the firms they do business with have the financial resources and operational infrastructure necessary to safeguard customer assets and conduct business properly.

For investors, this case underscores the importance of conducting due diligence on any firm before opening an account or making investments. Investors should verify that their broker-dealer is in good standing with FINRA and has not been subject to suspensions or other disciplinary actions. FINRA's BrokerCheck is a free resource that provides this information. If a firm has been suspended for failing to meet basic eligibility requirements, investors should consider that a serious warning sign and exercise extreme caution. Protecting your financial future starts with choosing firms that demonstrate a strong commitment to regulatory compliance and operational excellence.

Show Less

According to FINRA, Gabriela Chanel Alfaro (CRD #7609272), a registered representative based in Oxnard, California, was barred from the securities industry effective January 29, 2024, for failure to provide information or keep information current pursuant to FINRA Rule 9552(h). The associated FINRA ...

Read More

According to FINRA, Gabriela Chanel Alfaro (CRD #7609272), a registered representative based in Oxnard, California, was barred from the securities industry effective January 29, 2024, for failure to provide information or keep information current pursuant to FINRA Rule 9552(h). The associated FINRA Case number is 2023079176601.

FINRA Rule 9552(h) is one of the most consequential provisions in FINRA's enforcement toolkit. Under this rule, when a registered representative fails to respond to FINRA's requests for information during the course of an investigation or examination, and that individual's associated person status has already been revoked or they are no longer associated with a member firm, FINRA may impose an automatic bar from the industry. Unlike a suspension, which is temporary, a bar is a permanent prohibition from associating with any FINRA member firm in any capacity.

The requirement to cooperate with FINRA investigations is a fundamental obligation of every individual who registers with FINRA. When individuals enter the securities industry, they agree to abide by FINRA's rules, which include responding to requests for information. This obligation continues even after an individual leaves the industry. FINRA's ability to investigate potential misconduct depends on the cooperation of the individuals involved, and those who refuse to cooperate face the most severe consequences available under the expedited proceeding rules.

In the case of Gabriela Chanel Alfaro, the bar indicates that FINRA requested information from her, likely in connection with an investigation into potential rule violations, and she failed to provide that information. While the underlying investigation may have involved relatively minor concerns, the failure to cooperate itself is treated as a serious offense because it obstructs the regulatory process and prevents FINRA from fulfilling its mission to protect investors.

For investors, this case highlights the importance of working with registered representatives who maintain transparency and cooperate with regulators. A bar from the industry means that Alfaro is permanently prohibited from selling securities or advising investors through any FINRA member firm. Investors can verify the registration status of any broker by using FINRA's free BrokerCheck tool. If a broker has been barred, that information will appear prominently in their record, serving as a clear warning to potential clients.

Show Less